THE BIRTHMARK
A BEAUTIFUL, TRUE ADOPTION STORY
NOBODY KNOWS
By Ruth Lyberger September 1999
[Birth Mother of Roger Meir]
Nobody knows what a
mother goes through
When she gives up her baby so tiny and new
Nobody knows what
lies ahead
Sometimes a life that the mother dreads
Nobody knows the hurt
and the pain
Of not knowing if she will ever see him again
Nobody knows how it
feels
To know that time does not heal
Knowing your son is
somewhere out there
Not knowing what his parents will share
Nobody knows how a
mother longs
To know her son and to see how he’s done
Nobody knows if
you’ll ever meet
The son you gave up when you were weak
Nobody knows what joy
it is to
Hear the words “I forgave you”
Nobody knows what God
has in store
He gave me a son and a whole lot more
Nobody knows how
happy I’ve been
To meet my son and start over again
Only God knows that
this was His plan
And now with joy and love we are both in God’s hand
So till you walk in
this mother’s shoes
You’ll never know
what she’s been through
THE ERRORS OF THE GAP THEORY IN GENESIS 1
Scofield
and McGee – Scofield first published his cross
reference Bible in 1905, and revised it with dispensational notes in 1917.
McGee began his Thru the Bible ministry in 1967. Both were influential about
the Gap Theory, based on a misinterpretation of two Hebrew phrases.
Scofield
annotates Genesis 1:2 to the effect that the word
translated was in that verse can
also mean became. Now if we read ‘and the earth became without form and void,’ it does
suggest that something evil happened, something against what we know as the
perfect character of God and His works, and this paves
the way for a theory about pre-Adamic beings in a world spoilt by Satan, before
the Fall of man recorded in Genesis 3.
What
are the facts about the Hebrew word hayethah? First, it normally means ‘was,’ not ‘became.’ A typical example is Genesis 29:17 which says Rachel was (hayethah) beautiful and well favored. This
word hayethah is
the one used about the earth in Genesis 1:2, and there is no difference in the
construction of ‘Rachel was beautiful and well favored,’ and ‘the earth was without
form, and void.’ There is therefore no need to suggest that it
has the rare meaning ‘became’ on the
grounds of context.
But is there something about the actual words translated ‘without form, and void’ which would force us to choose the rarer reading? Scofield seemed to think so, probably because he took the Hebrew words tohu wa bohu to mean ‘chaotic.’ Today, this word is very negative, but of course the Hebrew doesn’t say it was, or became, chaotic. It merely points to a condition of shapelessness, or unformedness.
But
they were not the firsts to promote the Gap Theory.
In
1814, Dr. Thomas Chalmers, a respected Scottish Presbyterian minister began to
advocate the idea of a gap between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. The
reason for this was not theological—it was geological. By interpreting the
first two verses of Genesis in this way, Dr.
Chalmers felt that he could accommodate the views of the geologists of his day
who were teaching millions of years, while at the same time maintaining
a literal interpretation of the Genesis account of creation.
There are many
different versions as to what supposedly happened during this gap of time, but
most versions of the gap theory place millions of years of geologic time (including billions of animal fossils)
between the Bible’s first two verses.
This version of the gap theory is sometimes called the ruin-reconstruction
theory. Most ruin-reconstruction
theorists have allowed the fallible theories of secular scientists to determine
the meaning of Scripture and have, therefore, accepted the
millions-of-years dates for the fossil record.
Many people assume there is a great gap in time between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2. Most of these do this to accommodate the geological age system of billions of years of supposed earth history in the Genesis record of creation. The idea is something like this: billions of years ago God created the space-mass-time universe. Then the geological ages took place over billions of years of earth history. The different forms of life developed that are now preserved in the fossil record. These life-forms represent those ages - the invertebrates of the Cambrian Period, the dinosaurs of the Cretaceous Period ... finally the mammals, birds and ‘ape-men’ of the Tertiary Period - just before the recent epoch.
·
Then the idea is that,
at the end of these geological ages, a great cataclysm took place on earth,
with Satan having rebelled in heaven and many of the angels following him in
that rebellion. God, therefore, cast him to the earth,
and the earth underwent a great cataclysm, leaving it finally without form and
void, and with darkness on the face of the deep, as described in Genesis 1:2.
·
Subsequently, according
to this idea—usually known as the ‘gap’ theory—God then re-created
or reconstituted the earth in the six literal days of creation recorded in the first chapter of Genesis. The
argument for this theory makes verse two read, ‘The earth became without form and void’ (some would render it ‘The earth became waste and desolate’), as though
it had previously been a beautiful world. But now, because of the cataclysm, it
was a devastated remnant of a world, so that there was a change of condition.
It became without form and void.
In the book 100 Christian Books That Changed the Century, William J. and Randy Petersen acknowledge the long-term impact of The Genesis Flood: “Creation science has been controversial within the evangelical community as well as in society at large, but there is no doubt of the impact of this book by Whitcomb and Morris. . . . By the end of the century the book had gone into its forty-first printing. . . . Creation science became a major force . . . and has a substantial presence in the fields of science and education, all stemming from the influential book by Whitcomb and Morris.”
How did this happen? By
the mercy of God, through His inspired, infallible
written Word.
We firmly believed that
all compromise views, such as the gap theory, the day-age theory, and the
framework hypothesis, which had been taught in one form or another for over one
hundred years, would eventually be crushed by the rock of Holy Scripture. Our
Lord Jesus Christ was there
when the earth was created, for “all things were made through Him” (John 1:3). His account of creation and the Flood are perfectly true because He
“cannot lie” (Titus 1:2) and He “is the same
yesterday, today, and forever” (Hebrews 13:8). (John Whitcomb &
Henry Morris – 1961)
For non-Hebrew readers like me, there is another easy way to show that there cannot be a gap. Exodus 20:11 plainly says, “In six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them.” So God made everything in six days, including things in the heavens.
Sources: Answers in Genesis / Scofield Bible / Wikipedia / Modern Times / The Genesis Flood
“Uncle” Jack Vinson was recovering from an appendectomy when bandits pillaged a village inhabited by a number of Christians. He insisted on going to check on them. While he was there, the bandits returned and Uncle Jack was captured. After being roped together with a long line of prisoners, he was ordered to start walking. Because of his recent surgery, he was unable to keep up.
A young Chinese girl heard a bandit threaten to shoot him if he did not hurry. Uncle Jack replied, “If you shoot me, I shall go straight to heaven.” The soldier shot him.
When “Uncle” Ham heard this account, he wrote a poem that I think reflects the feelings of all those missionaries under whose influence we were reared:
Afraid to see the Savior’s face
To hear His welcome, and to trace
The glory gleam from wounds of grace?
Afraid—of that?
Afraid? Of What?
A flash, a crash, a pierced heart;
Darkness, light, O heaven’s art!
A wound of His a counterpart!
Afraid—of that?
Afraid? Of What?
To enter into Heaven’s rest,
And yet to serve the Master blest,
From service good to service best?
Afraid—of that?
Afraid? Of What?
To do by death what life could not—
Baptize with blood a stony plot,
Till souls shall blossom from the spot?
Afraid—of that?
My humble words can not express the emotion I feel in viewing what others have felt in composing these thoughts. How amazing.
ReplyDelete